Legal Opinion
Fontaine v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2009No. H033811PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Paul Fontaine obtained a loan for personal, family or household use from real party in interest CashCall, Inc. (hereafter CashCall). After CashCall attempted to collect the debt, Fontaine filed a complaint in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging that the collection methods used by CashCall and four of its employees violated the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Civ. Code, § 1788 et seq.). CashCall responded by bringing a motion to transfer the action to Orange County Superior Court on the ground that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Wasatch Property Management v. DegrateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Siskiyou v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Dow Agrosciences LLC v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Brawley v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Co. of Siskiyou v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.