Legal Opinion

Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. People ex rel. County Treasurer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Hancock county; the Hon. William C. Norcross, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

This was an application made at the May term, 1893, of the county court of Hancock county, by the county treasurer, for judgment on the delinquent tax list for the taxes assessed for the year 1892 on the property of the Keokuk and Hamilton Bridge Company. The company appeared and filed objections to the rendition of judgment, and the cause was continued. At the following August term the court, over the objections of the company, made an order, allowing a change in the description of the tangible property assessed, and a bill of exceptions was taken and the cause again continued. There was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Iowa v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Pacific Hotel Co. v. LiebIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Spencer & Gardner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Quincy Railroad Bridge Co. v. County of AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hart v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. First Lien Co. v. MarkleIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People Ex Rel. Wangelin v. City of St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Maxwell v. People Ex Rel. FreiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. Hibernian Banking Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API