Legal Opinion

Reschke v. Eadi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with costs, and action dismissed. Memorandum: This is an action brought pursuant to CPLR 3213 seeking accelerated judgment on a promissory note. Defendant appeals from Special Term’s order, and the judgment entered thereon which ordered him to pay plaintiff $5,100, plus interest at 8% per annum from the date of the note. He alleges that the note is unenforceable because it demands a usurious rate of interest (General Obligations Law, § 5-511, subd 2). We agree. By the terms of note, plaintiff agreed to advance defendant the sum of $14,000, the term of the loan not to exceed…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hammond v. MarranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Kredietbank, N v. v. ESIC Capital Corp. (In Re Rosner)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  3. Moran v. Faucett, New York County Courts1983
  4. Freitas v. Geddes Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Freitas v. Geddes Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API