Legal Opinion
California Franchise Tax Board v. Kendall (In Re Jones)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2011No. 10-60000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed July 12, 2011 is withdrawn and replaced with the accompanying opinion.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The petition for panel rehearing is denied. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
At issue in this bankruptcy appeal is a tax debt owed by Brenda Marie Jones (“Jones”) to the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”). The bankruptcy court and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) found that the debt was not excepted from discharge in Jones’s Chapter 7…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re ShayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Putnam v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Putnam)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Sender v. Golden (In re Golden)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Carol A. JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2020