Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Duke

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

Suit commenced before a justice of the peace, on a promissory note made by appellees to appellants. Judgment for appellants. Appeal to the circuit court, wherein, on a trial by the court, a finding and judgment *63were had for the appellees. Proper proceedings have brought the case, with all the evidence, before us.

The note was given for a horse sold by appellants, as their own property, to John Duke, at a public sale. George W. Duke was surety on the note. Soon after the sale, Henry Stout brought a suit in replevin against John Duke, and recovered possession of the horse as his own property.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hackleman v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shores Lumber Co. v. ClaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Reynolds v. PalmerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1884
  3. Bash v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Jenkins v. CraigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API