Legal Opinion

Chacon v. Copeland

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided April 30, 2015No. Case No. A-12-CA-226-SSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAM SPARKS, District Judge.

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants Eric Copeland and Russell Rose’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [# 70],1 Plaintiff Carlos Chacon’s Motion for Entry of Judgment [# 84], Defendant Russell Rose’s Response [# 86] thereto, and Plaintiffs Reply [# 87] thereto, Defendant Russell Rose’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or, Alternatively Motion for New Trial or Remittitur [# 85], Plaintiffs Response [# 88] thereto, and Defendant’s Reply [# 89] thereto. Having reviewed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delaughter v. WoodallDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
  2. Le v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Nobles v. City of AustinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API