Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Leske

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1991No. Docket 121555Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMichael J. Kelly, J.

I disagree that time spent in a halfway house is not tantamount to confinement in jail for purposes of the sentencing credit statute, MCL 769.11b; MSA 28.1083(2). See People v Greene, 145 Mich App 580; 378 NW2d 553 (1985); *159People v Winchell, 143 Mich App 164; 371 NW2d 514 (1985). Therefore, I respectfully dissent. I would order credit of 133 days for time spent at New Paths halfway house on resentencing.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WinchellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. GreeneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985