Legal Opinion · Dissent

Puckett v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided August 18, 2009No. 2008-CA-01159-COAPublished

1DissentKing, C.J.

¶ 32. I concur with the majority opinion, except as to the issue of the awarding of attorney’s fees, and therefore, I write separately on that issue. The majority position on this question would seem to be succinctly set forth in the following sentence: “We have concluded that the county court judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding punitive damages to Robert Gordon; thus, we likewise conclude that the county court judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding Gordon attorney’s fees.” Such a statement would seem to imply that where the imposition of punitive damages is found not to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United American Ins. Co. v. MerrillMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. A & F PROPERTIES, LLC v. Lake Caroline, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
  3. Erickson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API