Legal Opinion

Deidesheimer v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appear from the County Court of Placer County.

1Opinion of the Court

Burnett, J., delivered'the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

Action before Justice’s Court, to recover mining-claim; summons issued and served February 3,1857, returnable February 14. Defendant moved to dismiss the case, because the summons was dated, issued, and served, more than ten days before its return. Motion overruled, and defendant answered. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed to the County Court. Do*340fendant again moved to dismiss, and motion overruled. Trial upon the merits, and judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals to this Court.

- The motion of the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Lyman v. MiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State ex rel. Lane v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API