Legal Opinion
Beiner v. Goetz
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the city of New York, setting aside a verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff, as against the weight of evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtBijue, J.
This action was brought to recover for wrongful discharge under a contract of which the pertinent parts are as follows:
*245“ Whereas, said Beiner (plaintiff) represents himself to be an expert designer, competent to render the required services to the satisfaction of the said company,
“ Now, therefore * * * the parties agree
“ That the said company hires the services of the said Beiner for the purposes aforesaid at a salary of $60 per week, to commence on Oct." 16th, 1911 and to end Oct. 12th, 1912 * * *
‘ ‘ That the said Beiner, during the said term of employment, will render the services required…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. . Mail Express Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Ginsberg v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Haehnel v. TrostlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
- Wagner v. H. Herrmann Lumber Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934