Legal Opinion
Lachney v. Delaney
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1993No. 93-24PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOKER, Judge.
This is a worker’s compensation case. Claimant Keith Lachney1 appeals a judgment denying his claim for permanent total disability benefits, penalties, and attorney fees. The issues presented in this appeal are primarily factual. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
This worker’s compensation case arises from an accident on April 4, 1985. Keith Lachney, who was working for James E. Delaney as a brick mason, stepped in a rut and twisted his right foot and ankle. He fractured the first and second cuneiform and suffered a severe sprain of the medial plantar ligament, all of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Rosella v. DeDe's Wholesale FloristLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Alfred v. Mid-South MacH., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Austin v. Howard Discount Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. Biedenharn Bottling GroupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997