Riess v. De Luca
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from the order requiring appellee to place $10 a week into a bank account for the educational needs of the parties’ two minor children. Appellant contends that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to follow the guidelines for support that have been set forth by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court; (2) the trial court erred in questioning *624appellant’s candor and finding that appellant was attempting to punish appellee for exercising her right of visitation; (3) the record contains ex parte documents prejudicial to appellant. We agree with appellant’s first contention…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by17 opinions
- DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Shutter v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Ritter v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Ryan v. DeLongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Funk v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.