Legal Opinion

Riess v. De Luca

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1986No. 00068PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the order requiring appellee to place $10 a week into a bank account for the educational needs of the parties’ two minor children. Appellant contends that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to follow the guidelines for support that have been set forth by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court; (2) the trial court erred in questioning *624appellant’s candor and finding that appellant was attempting to punish appellee for exercising her right of visitation; (3) the record contains ex parte documents prejudicial to appellant. We agree with appellant’s first contention…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Shutter v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ritter v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Ryan v. DeLongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Funk v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API