Legal Opinion

Product Action International, Inc. v. Mero

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided August 5, 2003No. 1:03-cv-00881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This diversity action presents a question concerning the extent to which Indiana law allows courts to “blue pencil” or revise a former employee’s covenant not to compete with a former employer. The principal question is whether an employer can avoid the limits of the Indiana “blue pencil” doctrine by including in the agreement language to the effect that a court should enforce the agreement “to the extent permitted by law.” This court predicts that the answer under Indiana law is no.

Plaintiff Product Action International,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sidco Paper Company v. AaronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International, Inc. v. KotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clark's Sales and Service, Inc v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Michel Skaf, M.D. v. Wyoming Cardiopulmonary Services, P.C., a Wyoming corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Charlene Hassler v. Circle C ResourcesWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Dearborn v. Everett J. Prescott, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
  5. BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP. v. PALMERDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API