Product Action International, Inc. v. Mero
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This diversity action presents a question concerning the extent to which Indiana law allows courts to “blue pencil” or revise a former employee’s covenant not to compete with a former employer. The principal question is whether an employer can avoid the limits of the Indiana “blue pencil” doctrine by including in the agreement language to the effect that a court should enforce the agreement “to the extent permitted by law.” This court predicts that the answer under Indiana law is no.
Plaintiff Product Action International,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Sidco Paper Company v. AaronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International, Inc. v. KotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark's Sales and Service, Inc v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Michel Skaf, M.D. v. Wyoming Cardiopulmonary Services, P.C., a Wyoming corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Charlene Hassler v. Circle C ResourcesWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Dearborn v. Everett J. Prescott, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP. v. PALMERDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.