Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Bowery National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, the Bowery National Bank entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Beady, J.:

It appears that upon the 10th of October, 18*16, an agreement was made between John Mulholland and the Mayor, etc., for the construction of a sewer in Forty-second street from the Third avenue to the East river. The contract, amongst other things, provided as follows :

“ The party of the second part ” (being the defendant Mulholland) “ agrees that be will furnish the said commissioner of public works with satisfactory evidence that all persons who have'done work or furnished materials under this agreement, and who may have given written notice to said commissioners before or within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. Dannat v. . ComptrollerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Mechanics & Traders' National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API