Legal Opinion

Duan Le v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 1999No. 98-3609PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the offense of which petitioner was convicted is an aggravated felony under the controlling federal law. We hold that it is and meets the requirements of section 101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F).

Petitioner, Duan Le, a Vietnam citizen, was convicted of two third degree felonies — driving under the influence with serious bodily injury 1 and driving with a suspended license with serious bodily injury 2 —on December 30, 1996. On June 24, 1997, the Immigration and Naturalization Service…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orestes J. Asencio v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Hamid B. Mohammed v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Miguel Trinidad-AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Ming Lam Sui v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Fernandez-Bernal v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API