Legal Opinion

American Express Travel v. Moskoff

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 13, 1999No. 98-016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The defendant, David Moskoff, appeals a Superior Court (Gray, J.) order granting final default judgment to the plaintiff, American Express Travel. We vacate and remand.

In the spring of 1997, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to collect a credit card debt alleged in the amount of $96,777.89 plus attorney’s fees. In August 1997, the plaintiff served interrogatories upon the defendant, who failed to answer the interrogatories within thirty days. See SUPER. CT. R. 36. Pursuant to Superior Court Rule 36 (Rule 36), the plaintiff moved for conditional default, which the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. American Board of Trade, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Appeal of BarrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Town of Hudson v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. Frisbie Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. LaMarche v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. Jane Doe v. Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API