Ex Parte Schultz
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus.
Unquestionably the most difficult and perplexing problems which ever come before a court for decision are those questions which, while involving no financial consideration, have to do with those vitally important but wholly imponderable questions of human relations involving the basis sentiment of the care, custody, control, and welfare of a minor child. Such a one is the present case.
The petition charges that a minor, a baby boy, is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by Mr. and Mrs. John Doe, prospective adoptive parents…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Adoption of a MinorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Wyness v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Lee v. Thomas Et UxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Williams Et Ux. v. CapparelliOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- French v. Catholic Community LeagueOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. FranklinNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Sees v. BaberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Adoption of McKinzieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- In Re Adoption of D____Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re the Adoption of FUtah Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.