Legal Opinion

People v. Lawyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1935No. Crim. No. 1845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

9 Cal.App.2d 69 (1935)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

WALTER LAWYER, Appellant.

Crim. No. 1845.

California Court of Appeals. First Appellate District, Division Two.

September 3, 1935.

Walter Lawyer, in pro. per., for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

Nourse, P. J.

The defendant was tried on an information charging the stealing of a cow. Following his conviction he appealed to this court and the judgment and the motion denying a new trial were both affirmed. Thereafter he made a motion in the trial court to set aside the judgment on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. People v. LawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API