Legal Opinion
Kinkela v. Incorporated Village of Mineola
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries and malicious prosecution, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated March 6, 2002, which denied their motion to compel the plaintiff to respond to certain inquiries during her examination before trial.
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is deemed an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
No appeal lies as of right from an order denying a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mann v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Moran v. International Playtex, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- McGuire v. ZarlengoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garritano v. GarritanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mayer v. 486 Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Plaza at Patterson, LLC v. Clover Lake Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Alcena v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mayer v. 486 Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006