Legal Opinion
Starcher v. Correctional Medical Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1998No. 96-4250PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Attorney Teresa Cunningham’s appeal requires us to opine on an issue that has divid*420ed our sister circuits: whether an attorney who eventually withdraws or is disqualified from a ease may take an immediate, interlocutory appeal from an order in that case levying attorney’s fees and costs against her for discovery violations. We believe the better view to be that an attorney in these circumstances may not take an immediate appeal, but rather must wait to file an appeal until final judgment is entered in the case. Because we lack jurisdiction to entertain this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rudd Equipment Co. v. John Deere Construction & Forestry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Joseph v. Elan Motorsports Technologies Racing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Thomas A. Fox v. Saginaw County, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.