Legal Opinion

State v. Rimmasch

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. 20760Published

1Opinion of the Court

775 P.2d 388 (1989)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Phillip RIMMASCH, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20760.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 17, 1989.

Craig S. Cook, John D. O'Connell, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

R. Paul Van Dam, Earl F. Dorius, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellee.

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Phillip Rimmasch was charged and convicted after a bench trial of forcible sexual abuse, rape, forcible sodomy, and incest. These charges arose out of alleged incidents of sexual activity between defendant and his daughter. Rimmasch's sentence was stayed, and he was…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. BuellOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API