Rossman v. City of Moultrie
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The principal argument at the bar was whether the ordinance under attack imposed a license tax for revenue purposes, or was it a regulatory measure providing a reasonable compensation for the expense of inspection under the police-power ordinance? Counsel for plaintiffs in error insist that the ordinance is one imposing a tax for revenue, and rather concede that if it were a mere regulatory measure the city was justified in imposing it. Under the evidence the $15 charge is reasonable in amount if it be a license fee. The following facts incline us to the view that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis & Co. v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Georgia Milk Producers Confederation v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Gunn v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Wofford Oil Co. v. City of PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Pratt v. City of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Producers Ass'n of San Antonio v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Cotton Pickin' Fairs, Inc. v. Town of GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Felt v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Felt v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956