Legal Opinion

Rossman v. City of Moultrie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1940No. 13138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The principal argument at the bar was whether the ordinance under attack imposed a license tax for revenue purposes, or was it a regulatory measure providing a reasonable compensation for the expense of inspection under the police-power ordinance? Counsel for plaintiffs in error insist that the ordinance is one imposing a tax for revenue, and rather concede that if it were a mere regulatory measure the city was justified in imposing it. Under the evidence the $15 charge is reasonable in amount if it be a license fee. The following facts incline us to the view that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis & Co. v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Georgia Milk Producers Confederation v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Gunn v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Wofford Oil Co. v. City of PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Pratt v. City of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Producers Ass'n of San Antonio v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Cotton Pickin' Fairs, Inc. v. Town of GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Felt v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Felt v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API