Legal Opinion

Timken Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 80-544PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, J.

The issue presented by this cause is whether the determination of the Board of Tax Appeals not to exempt for taxation various equipment and costs of appellee’s new modified boilers was reasonable and lawful.

R. C. 5709.20(B) defines an “air pollution control facility” as: “***any property designed, constructed, or installed for the primary purpose of eliminating or reducing the emission of, or ground level concentration of, air contaminants which *227renders air harmful or inimical to the public health or to property within this state.”

Appellee filed its application for an air pollution control…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ohio Children's Society, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Transue & Williams v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Epic Aviation, L.L.C. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Astoria Generating Co. v. General Counsel of New York State Departmant of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Marietta Coal Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Veolia Water N. Am. Operating Servs., Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API