Legal Opinion
Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 19, 1956No. 5-884PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Minor W. Millwee, Associate Justice.
Appellee, Rainfair, Inc., is engaged in the manufacture of men’s slacks in its plant at Wynne, Arkansas, where it employed approximately one hundred women and seven men in April, 1955. None of the employees were members of a labor union at that time but some of them had signed membership application cards with appellant, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, C. I. 0., hereinafter called “Union.” On Monday, May 2, 1955, twenty-nine employees failed to return to work and a picket line was established by the Union. Appellee’s plant manager notified said…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Lindsay v. Teamsters Union, Local No. 74North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- United Mine Workers of America v. Golden Cycle Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Piasecki Aircraft Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local Number 840Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.