Legal Opinion

In re Mirsky

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 10, 1941No. 26807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

On August 27, 1934, the bankrupt filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy and was adjudicated as such on that day. In his schedules, he fully set forth the terms of a trust fund wherein he had a contingent interest of unknown value. This asset was called to the attention of the referee when the bankrupt filed his petition. The referee attempted to obtain a bid for this contingent interest. There was no manifestation of interest in this direction on the part of any purchaser or of the creditors; and the case was closed on January 15, 1935. No trustee was appointed.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clowe v. . SeaveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Kinder v. ScharffSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MirskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API