Legal Opinion

In Re the Custody of Skipper

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1964No. 176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Respondent assigns as error that portion of Judge Mintz’ order holding the plea in abatement insufficient to deprive the Superior Court of this State of jurisdiction to determine the question of custody. Since this contention, if sustained, would render petitioner’s appeal moot, we decide respondent’s appeal first.

A plea in abatement seeking dismissal of an action, because another action is pending between the same parties on the same right of action, should be sustained when, and only when, the actions are pending in different courts of the same sovereign. If the actions are brought in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Miami County Nat. Bank of Paola, Kan. v. BancroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Custody of SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Lehrer v. EDGECOMBE MANUFACTURING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API