Harding v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant seeks to vacate his December, 1985 convictions, following a jury trial, for kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1978; sexual abuse in the first degree, § 566.100, RSMo 1988; robbery first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1978; and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1978. These convictions were affirmed on appeal. State v. Harding, 734 S.W.2d 871 (Mo.App.1987). •
Movant asserts the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion was clearly erroneous on two points, both grounded in ineffectiveness of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.