Legal Opinion

People v. Cheeseborough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant pleaded guilty to attempted robbery in the *535second degree in full satisfaction of his indictment, his trial having ended in a mistrial when the jury was unable to reach a verdict on 5 of the 7 counts submitted. He now contends that the mistrial was declared prematurely and that his reprosecution violated his right under the State and Federal Constitutions against double jeopardy.

Pursuant to CPL 310.60 (1) (a), a mistrial may be declared when "[t]he jury has deliberated for an extensive period of time without agreeing upon a verdict * * * and the court is satisfied that any such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Plummer v. RothwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. SparacinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Spivack ex rel. Milton v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API