Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Hoover

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1923No. 24,727PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage. The case was tried to the court, who made exhaustive findings of fact as follows:

“1. N. N. Hoover and E. E. Morris, in the spring of 1919, entered into an agreement whereby Morris was to purchase peaches in the vicinity of Mountainburg, Arkansas, and Hoover was to market such peaches, and profits and losses were to be divided equally between them.
“2. That at such time, and until about June 1, 1920, Morris was cashier of the Bank of Mountainburg.
“3. Morris was cashier of the Bank of Mountainburg, from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berry v. ColbornWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Williams v. . GilliesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Runkle v. BurrageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Johnson v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Lemay v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Stricklin v. Parsons Stockyard Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Leach v. Battle Creek Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Baron v. LymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. McCulloh v. DoyleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API