Legal Opinion

Lines v. City of Bainbridge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 24, 2005No. A05A0074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Earl Lines, Warren Schoenfisch, and Johnny Williams sued the City of Bainbridge for alleged lost profits, attorney fees, and other costs and expenses connected with a tax sale that the city declared void. The trial court granted the city’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ claims for lost profits and attorney fees, prompting this appeal. We discern no error and affirm.

On appeal from the grant of a motion for summary judgment, we conduct a de novo review of the law and evidence, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, to determine whether a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Driggers v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Money v. THOMPSON & GREEN MACHINERY COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Daniels v. Price Communications Wireless, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. McCondichie v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roofing Supply of Atlanta, Inc. v. Forrest Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Wilson v. HH Savannah, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API