Legal Opinion

United States v. James Carbullido

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 2002No. 01-10578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.

We consider here the application of issue preclusion in the double jeopardy context based on a judge’s findings as opposed to a jury verdict. According to a stipulation before the district court, James Car-bullido was involved in a series of arsons over an approximately one-year period. After indictment for one of the arsons, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity in a bench trial. Through an unusual and unexpected combination of circumstances, it turned out that he was never committed, but was unconditionally released. As a consequence, the government sought a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Corey DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API