United States v. James Carbullido
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
We consider here the application of issue preclusion in the double jeopardy context based on a judge’s findings as opposed to a jury verdict. According to a stipulation before the district court, James Car-bullido was involved in a series of arsons over an approximately one-year period. After indictment for one of the arsons, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity in a bench trial. Through an unusual and unexpected combination of circumstances, it turned out that he was never committed, but was unconditionally released. As a consequence, the government sought a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Corey DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013