Legal Opinion
In Re State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided February 14, 2005No. 03-04-00684-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
The State of Texas filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with this Court contending that the district court issued a void order assessing attorneys’ fees in a case after this Court’s mandate had issued. Because we hold that the trial court had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter at issue, we deny the petition.
BACKGROUND
The State’s petition arises out of proceedings in the district court following the issuance of our mandate in Anderson Courier Service v. State of Texas, 104 S.W.3d 121 (Tex.App.-Austin, March 6, 2003). In Anderson, we considered…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. ANDERSON COURIER SERVICE, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Lakeside Realty, Inc. Ex Rel. Sunrise Construction, Inc. v. Life Scape Homeowners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
- Funke v. Aggregate Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Cecil Adams and Maxine Adams v. Harris County and Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the First Court of Appeals, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Dean's Campin' Co. v. Peter Hardsteen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.