Legal Opinion

Robert Tavernier v. Weyerhaeuser Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 17, 1962No. 17640_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case the sole question is whether plaintiff-appellant’s first claim for relief, for personal injuries, is barred by the Oregon two-year statute of limitations. (O.R.S. 12.110). The trial judge held that the claim is barred. We are reversing.

The facts are simple. Appellant was injured on January 3, 1957. He was then sixteen years old. He was lawfully married on June 27, 1957, and became 21 on June 1, 1961. This action was filed on April 6, 1961. Thus the claim is barred unless the running of the statute is tolled. The tolling statute is O.R.S. 12.160,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kilgour v. GockleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Bock v. CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Morrison v. HolladayOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ex Parte PackerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hicks v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Amfac Mortgage Corp. v. Arizona Mall of Tempe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Ness v. National Indemnity Company of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1965
  3. Galvan v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Sherby v. Weather Bros. Transfer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. Stephens v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API