Legal Opinion

Brady v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Tort, under St. 1887, c. 270, for injuries received by the plaintiff while at work in the freight yard of the defendant at Westfield. Writ dated September 23, 1901. At the trial in the Superior Court before Fox, J., the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $4,000; and the defendant alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.

The plaintiff was a car inspector employed at night in the defendant’s Westfield yard. It was his duty upon the arrival of a train to inspect all its cars. If he found a car defective, it was his duty to repair it where it stood, if possible; otherwise to have it set out from the train. His tour of work was from six o’clock in the afternoon until seven o’clock the. next morning. During this time ten to thirteen freight trains came in, each composed of from thirty to thirty-five cars. About one o’clock in the night of August 16, 1901, two freight trains entered the yard in close succession,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Columbian Fire Proofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Sweetland v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. McNee v. Coburn Trolley Track Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. HamerickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Massell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Howard v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Anthony v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API