Legal Opinion

Clement v. Producers' Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1925No. 6824. [fn*]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH J.

On January 13, 1916, the Home Petroleum Company employed W. J. Clement under the following contract;

“Home Petroleum Company.
“Fort Worth, Texas, January 13, 1916.
“W. J. Clement, Gainesville, Texas — Dear Sir: You are hereby appointed agent for the Home Petroleum Company at Gainesville, effective December 1, 1915.
“Your duties will be to sell and distribute there, and in the territory hereafter designated by us in writing as tributary thereto, the goods and products which you may be supplied by the company, to collect accounts due or which may become due the company in that locality, to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clegg v. BrannanTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Welch v. Phelps & Bigelow Wind Mill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Carpenter v. DresslerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Weil v. AbeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fitts v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Smith v. Columbian Carbon Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Handy v. Olney Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Vincent v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Hutchinson v. Texas Aluminum CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API