Legal Opinion
Republic Steel Corp. v. Train
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1977No. 76-1557PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.
This case of first impression arises under the 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, P.L. 92-500.1 The question presented is whether failure of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to define interim effluent limitations reflecting a given level of pollution control technology, as required by the Act, frees an authorized state agency to issue a discharge permit which sanctions noncompliance with the statutory deadline for achieving that degree of effluent abatement.
The law in the case consists of three…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- American Petroleum Institute v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- American Iron & Steel Institute v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company v. Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Russell E. Train, Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Terence D. Hughey v. Jms Development Corporation, Terrence D. Hughey v. Jms Development Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Republic Steel Corp. v. CostleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Ford Motor Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and State of Michigan, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- State of Washington, and Its Department of Ecology v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, and Clifford v. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region X, Scott Paper Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, and Clifford v. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region X, Scott Paper Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Russell E. Train, Administrator, and Clifford v. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region X, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Washington v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.