Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 22, 1983No. AP-299PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
438 So.2d 174 (1983)
Michael MAHONEY, Appellant,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY and Crawford & Company, Appellees.
No. AP-299.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
September 22, 1983.
Alex Lancaster, Sarasota, for appellant.
Keith A. Mann of Dickinson, O'Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, Sarasota, for appellees.
BOOTH, Judge.
Claimant appeals an order of the deputy commissioner denying his request for future remedial medical care for his eyes. Testimony establishes that medical care will be required due to the industrial accident, but at a time in the future probably beyond the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Goodyear Service Store v. RockeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Western Liquors Corp. v. StuderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Orlando v. BlackburnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Solar Pane Insulating Glass v. HANSEENDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Lee v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Florida Structures, Inc. v. MortonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Florida Hosp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.