Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Nowlin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1928No. 3046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHard, C. J.

This is the second appeal in this case; the judgment having been reversed the first time, because of the admission of improper testimony.

After the cause was remanded, the defendant Roberts filed his first amended answer, which contains neither a general demurrer nor any special exceptions; but, from the recitals in the amendment, it appears that the pleader is endeavoring to rely upon the demurrer and exceptions set forth in the original answer. Of course, this cannot be done, since the amendment must stand alone, and is, under district and county court rule No. 14, to be considered as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wootton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co. v. GrisierTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Roberts v. NowlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Davis v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. International-Great Northern R. v. MotleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Barrington v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Rise Above Steel Company, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API