Legal Opinion

Benefiel v. Semper

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — George Jbpson, Judge. Action for damages for assault and battery. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $200. On motion of the defendant, the trial court ordered a new trial. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The plaintiff is a married woman. She and her husband were tenants at will, in possession of certain residence property owned by the defendant. The defendant went to the house for the purpose of serving upon his tenants a notice to quit. His attempted reading of the notice was interrupted by the plaintiff. Concerning this, she testified as follows:

“When Mr. Semper came to my house, he started to read the notice, and I told him he could not read any notice to me. T took the mop and swiped the notice off the table and out of the house, — he had laid the notice on the table,— and told him if he…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HollisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Rupp v. KohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Tone v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Eby Ex Rel. Eby v. SanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Manders v. DallamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API