Legal Opinion

State v. Bumpers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1967No. 826PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

The defendant makes a very interesting argument in his brief to the effect that it was error for the Court, to excuse prospective jurors on the ground that such persons did not believe in capital punishment. He recognizes that this position has been adversely determined in the very recent case of State v. Childs, 269 N.C. 307, 152 S.E. 2d 453, but requests that the Court reconsider and reverse the ruling therein made. However, this decision was adopted by a unanimous Court within the past few weeks, and the reasoning of it is sound and convincing. The following excerpts, some of which are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. NassarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API