Legal Opinion

Courtell v. McEachen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1956No. Civ. 22167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appellants have filed an application for an order of this court augmenting the record on appeal by adding to the clerk’s transcript on appeal a supplement show ing separately each instruction given to the jury, by whom each such instruction was requested, and whether the same was given as requested or whether the same was modified by the court; and also adding all instructions requested by the parties but refused by the court, showing in each instance the party by whom such instruction was requested.

It appears that the reporter’s transcript on appeal contains each instruction which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dixon v. HartnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Gelini v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API