Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Eudora School District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 2005No. 04-1291Published

1Opinion of the Court

208 S.W.3d 206 (2005)

Victoria CRENSHAW, Elmer Boatner, Willia Bean, Mary Agnew, et al., Petitioners,

v.

EUDORA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Dermott School District, Forrest City School District, Respondents.

No. 04-1291.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 12, 2005.

Dover, Dixon, Horne, PLLC, by Michael R. Johns, Thomas S. Stone, and Nona M. Morris, Little Rock, for petitioners.

Laser Law Firm, by Dan F. Bufford, Little Rock, for respondents.

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.

This case involves a question of law certified to this court by the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in accordance with our…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Hannah; Concurrence · Hannah.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. DuPree v. Alma School District No. 30Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API