Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hawaiian Association of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Wong.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2013No. SCWC-28592Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

POLLACK, J.,

in which ACOBA, J., joins.

I agree with the majority that “[t]he main issue before this court is whether Paragraph 16 of the Lease prohibits SDA’s practice of renting cabins, as vacation residences, to members of the public not affiliated with the Church or School.” Majority Opinion at 46-47, 305 P.3d at 462-63. However, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Paragraph 16 is ambiguous. I believe that Paragraph 16 unambiguously permits cabin rentals to the general public based on: 1) the plain meaning and common application of the word…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Marini v. IrelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API