Legal Opinion

McCurley v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1971No. 19250PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

This action was brought against the City of Anderson and The South Carolina Highway Department to recover damages to plaintiff’s real property, upon the theory that the damages amounted to a taking of private property without just compensation, within the meaning of Article 1, Section 17, of the South Carolina Constitution. Upon the trial of the case and the conclusion of the testimony, the Highway Department was, on motion, eliminated from the case and the action proceeded to judgment against the city, from which the city has appealed.

The sole question to be decided is whether…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Webb v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Conestee Mills v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Silvester v. Spring Valley Country ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Glenn v. School District No. Five of Anderson CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Cutchin v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API