Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Universal Underwriters Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 9, 2003No. A03A1605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

This appeal involves a dispute over the amount of excess insurance coverage payable under OCGA § 33-34-3 (d), which provides in general that, where a new or used car dealer provides a customer with a dealer-owned car to test drive (or to use as a loaner while repairs are done on the customer’s car), and the customer is involved in an accident while driving the dealer’s car, the customer’s private automobile insurance provides primary coverage and the insurance policy covering the dealer’s car provides excess coverage. Specifically, subsection (d) provides:

Each policy…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. American Home Assurance Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Commercial Union Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Ga. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Southern Gen. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Bankers Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API