Legal Opinion

Laprelle v. Key, Chief Justice

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1924No. 3566PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chapman

Relators asked for a mandamus against those of respondents who are members of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas requiring said respondents to certify to this court certain questions of law held by said respondents in the case of LaPrelle et al., v. Brown, decided by said respondents February 25, 1920, reported in 220 S. W. at page 151. It be:ng alleged in the application that the decision of respondents in said case is in conflict with the opinions of other courts of Civil Appeals of this State on the same questions of law. At the outset we are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCurdy Daniels v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McGhee v. RomatkaTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Yoacham v. McCurdy & DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Dillingham v. Roberts Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1963
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API