Legal Opinion

Warner v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 14, 2012No. 11-341 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action for disability retirement pay. Plaintiff, Zachary C. Warner, was separated from the United States Air Force after a physical evaluation board (“PEB”) determined he was unfit for duty and recommended his discharge without disability benefits. Pending are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record under Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Oral argument is deemed not necessary. For the reasons set forth below, we grant defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

After enlisting in the Air Force, Mr. Warner started…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Robinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API