Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 2014No. 70738-8-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 An employee who is discharged for “mis-

Cox, J.

conduct connected with his or her work” is disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits.1 The Commissioner of the Employment Security Department affirmed the award to Sarah Black of unemployment compensation benefits following her discharge by Puget Sound Security Patrol (PSSP) for a post she made on Facebook. The superior court affirmed. Because PSSP fails in its burden to show that the Commissioner’s action was invalid, we affirm.

f 2 The material facts are established by the findings of fact. Black worked as a full-time,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Wash. Emp. SEC. Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hamel v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michael J. Beagan v. Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training, Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
  2. Seattle City Light, Respondent, v. Aaron Swanson, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Pinnacle Bancorp v. MoritzNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. All Natural Herbs, Llc, V. State Liquor And Cannabis BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Crown Resources, Corp. v. Dep't of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API