Mattingly v. Fidanza
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAMBERT, Judge:
Michelle Mattingly (formerly Fidanza) has appealed from the portion of the Old-ham Family Court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and final decree designating a portion of the UBS financial accounts belonging to her and her former husband, John Francis Fidanza III, as non-marital, as well as from the family court’s order denying her motion to alter, amend, or vacate that order. We have carefully considered the record and the parties’ arguments, and we agree with Michelle that the family court failed to make sufficient findings of fact to support its decision.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sexton v. SextonKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- B.C. v. B.T.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
- Turley v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Chenault v. ChenaultKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
- Rearden v. ReardenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Christopher J. Wolf v. Mellisa N. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Melzena Lulabell MooreKentucky Supreme Court · 2025