Reese v. State

OPINION ON REMAND

ROBERTSON, Justice.

On original submission we found no error in the trial court’s sustaining an informer’s claim of privilege under the Fifth Amendment. On petition for discretionary review, the court of criminal appeals found the claim of privilege was too broad and therefore spurious. 877 S.W.2d 328. On remand, we are to decide whether the trial court’s sustaining the informer’s claim was error. Because we find the error harmless, we again affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant was arrested for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance and received a…